From 70d76e79df9632f8f46af552574a0b474d068631 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Capetta <mcapetta@sipwise.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:53:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] TT#58502 Don't skip the ACC if user-to-user field is missing

This is necessary to avoid issues with ACC records in the
OLD format during an upgrade.
It should be changed back to -1 in mr8.+

Change-Id: Iebaa7f59fc343fedb46fdfee3381e9349ddd80d6
---
 cdr.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cdr.c b/cdr.c
index 0f473e0..0f262ad 100644
--- a/cdr.c
+++ b/cdr.c
@@ -467,8 +467,10 @@ static int cdr_parse_srcleg(char *srcleg, cdr_entry_t *cdr)
     tmp1 = strchr(tmp2, MED_SEP);
     if(tmp1 == NULL)
     {
-        L_WARNING("Call-Id '%s' has no separated User-to-User header, '%s'", cdr->call_id, tmp2);
-        return -1;
+        L_DEBUG("Call-Id '%s' has no separated User-to-User header, '%s'", cdr->call_id, tmp2);
+        /// Simply return 0 in order to avoid issues with ACC records in the OLD format during an upgrade
+        /// Added in mr8.1, it should be changed to -1 in mr9.+
+        return 0;
     }
     *tmp1 = '\0';
     g_strlcpy(cdr->header_u2u, tmp2, sizeof(cdr->header_u2u));