We were using a mix of .new() and :new() and
that lead us to errors when calling new with parameters
Just be consistent and choose one
Change-Id: Icc2078efb377b80942b2fb518db52df339ecda6a
We are going to use both modules app_lua and app_lua_sr until we
solve the missing pieces on KEMI:
* KSR.pvx.xavp_get() returns a string like '<<xavp:%p>>' not a table like
sr.xavp.get()
* KEMI lacks of something like sr.xavp.get_keys() funtion
So, migrate everything that we can to KEMI and keep using sr approach
for just that two cases
- mocks/sr.lua: use same objects for same behaviour
Change-Id: I475ff8f820586cdc94c75bff7466238215e05673
* fix pv mock to align kamailio behavior with pv_unset() for avps.
It removes only the first value not all, only when using '[*]'
pv_unset("$avp(name)") != pv_unset("$(avp(name)[*])")
pv_unset("$avp(name)") == pv_unset("$(avp(name)[0])")
pv_unset("$(avp(name)[1])") == pv_unset("$(avp(name)[0])")
Change-Id: I1aab2150d288da546b144388adb7b2f87ecfb069
Victor Seva