From da5a12c70fb7a9360dfadddc1628d80304e6e101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:43:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Working on SIP Support

Removed unnecessary code
---
 .../TestProtocolProviderServiceSipImpl.java   | 22 -------------------
 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/net/java/sip/communicator/slick/protocol/sip/TestProtocolProviderServiceSipImpl.java b/test/net/java/sip/communicator/slick/protocol/sip/TestProtocolProviderServiceSipImpl.java
index bcb795dcf..e8769027c 100644
--- a/test/net/java/sip/communicator/slick/protocol/sip/TestProtocolProviderServiceSipImpl.java
+++ b/test/net/java/sip/communicator/slick/protocol/sip/TestProtocolProviderServiceSipImpl.java
@@ -122,28 +122,6 @@ public void testRegister()
             logger.debug("We got thrown out while waiting for registration", t);
         }
 
-        // Here is registered the listener which will receive the first message
-        // This message is supposed to be offline message and as one is tested
-        // in TestOperationSetBasicInstantMessaging.testReceiveOfflineMessages()
-        Map supportedOperationSets =
-            fixture.provider1.getSupportedOperationSets();
-
-        //give time for the AIM server to notify everyone of our arrival
-        //simply waitinf is really not a reliable way of doing things but I
-        //can't think of anything better
-        Object lock = new Object();
-        synchronized(lock)
-        {
-            try
-            {
-                logger.debug("Giving the aim server time to notify for "
-                             +"our arrival!");
-                lock.wait(5000);
-            }
-            catch (Exception ex)
-            {}
-        }
-
         //make sure that the registration process trigerred the corresponding
         //events.
         assertTrue(