- Removes a SuppressWarnings because its warning can be resolved gracefully.

- Fixes a few javadocs.
cusax-fix
Lyubomir Marinov 17 years ago
parent 80f7da8aaa
commit a7077acd05

@ -103,12 +103,8 @@ private void actionPerformed(ActionListener listener, ActionEvent evt)
{
/*
* (non-Javadoc)
*
* @see net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.event.
* CallChangeAdapter
* #callStateChanged(net.java.sip.communicator
* .service.protocol.event.CallChangeEvent)
* Implements
* CallChangeAdapter#callStateChanged(CallChangeEvent).
*/
public void callStateChanged(CallChangeEvent evt)
{
@ -137,18 +133,12 @@ public void callStateChanged(CallChangeEvent evt)
{
try
{
CallPeer targetPeer =
findCallPeer(target);
CallPeer targetPeer = findCallPeer(target);
if (targetPeer == null)
{
telephony.transfer(callPeer, target);
}
else
{
telephony.transfer(callPeer,
targetPeer);
}
telephony.transfer(callPeer, targetPeer);
}
catch (OperationFailedException ex)
{
@ -161,36 +151,31 @@ public void callStateChanged(CallChangeEvent evt)
}
/**
* Returns the first <code>CallPeer</code> known to a specific
* <code>OperationSetBasicTelephony</code> to have a specific address.
* Returns the first <tt>CallPeer</tt> known to a specific
* <tt>OperationSetBasicTelephony</tt> to have a specific address.
*
* @param telephony the <code>OperationSetBasicTelephony</code> to have its
* <code>CallPeer</code>s examined in search for one which
* has a specific address
* @param address the address to locate the associated
* <code>CallPeer</code> of
* @param telephony the <tt>OperationSetBasicTelephony</tt> to have its
* <tt>CallPeer</tt>s examined in search for one which has a specific
* address
* @param address the address to locate the associated <tt>CallPeer</tt> of
* @return the first <tt>CallPeer</tt> known to the specified
* <tt>OperationSetBasicTelephony</tt> to have the specified address
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") //pfff ... well we can't make OpSetTelephony
//return a non-raw type iterator as it would break descendants that are using
//it with Call extensions. Someone would have to explain to me one day
//why java complains in such cases.
private CallPeer findCallPeer(
OperationSetBasicTelephony telephony, String address)
{
for (Iterator<Call> callIter = telephony.getActiveCalls();
callIter.hasNext();)
for (Iterator<? extends Call> callIter = telephony.getActiveCalls();
callIter.hasNext();)
{
Call call = callIter.next();
for (Iterator<CallPeer> peerIter =
call.getCallPeers(); peerIter.hasNext();)
for (Iterator<CallPeer> peerIter = call.getCallPeers();
peerIter.hasNext();)
{
CallPeer peer = peerIter.next();
if (address.equals(peer.getAddress()))
{
return peer;
}
}
}
return null;
@ -239,9 +224,7 @@ private CallPeer findCallPeer(String address)
{
peer = findCallPeer(telephony, address);
if (peer != null)
{
break;
}
}
}
return peer;
@ -254,12 +237,12 @@ private CallPeer findCallPeer(String address)
* The located <code>Frame</code> (if any) is often used as the owner of
* <code>Dialog</code>s opened by the specified <code>Component</code> in
* order to provide natural <code>Frame</code> ownership.
* </p>
*
*
* @param component the <tt>Component</tt> which is to have its
* <tt>Component</tt> hierarchy examined for <tt>Frame</tt>
* @return the first <code>Frame</code> in the ancestor
* <code>Component</code> hierarchy of the specified
* <code>Component</code>; <tt>null</tt>, if no such
* <code>Frame</code> was located
* <code>Component</code> hierarchy of the specified <code>Component</code>;
* <tt>null</tt>, if no such <code>Frame</code> was located
*/
public static Frame getFrame(Component component)
{
@ -268,9 +251,8 @@ public static Frame getFrame(Component component)
Container container = component.getParent();
if (container instanceof Frame)
{
return (Frame) container;
}
component = container;
}
return null;

Loading…
Cancel
Save