From bd2c55d20926ed85bbf2c3a2f515fb0e5278363d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerrit User 1000337 <1000337@c8638cca-8a65-4d18-ba9a-ecd43d1ca9c1> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:48:00 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update patch set 1 Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1 (1 comment) Patch-set: 1 Reviewer: Gerrit User 1000337 <1000337@c8638cca-8a65-4d18-ba9a-ecd43d1ca9c1> Label: Code-Review=-1 --- 7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb b/7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb index 74a265280e..94defade6a 100644 --- a/7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb +++ b/7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@ "message": "Commenting here to add myself to cc, and also wondering about ast_app_group_set_channel. I thought it\u0027s generally desirable to avoid changing existing public API, but it seems like it\u0027s only used in app_dial in the current tree, so probably not a big deal. But maybe someone else has different thoughts about this.", "revId": "7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb", "serverId": "c8638cca-8a65-4d18-ba9a-ecd43d1ca9c1" + }, + { + "unresolved": true, + "key": { + "uuid": "82cda966_53273aa4", + "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL", + "patchSetId": 1 + }, + "lineNbr": 0, + "author": { + "id": 1000337 + }, + "writtenOn": "2021-12-14T16:48:00Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "Upon further thought, as discussed, I don\u0027t think the ast_app_group_set_channel public API should be modified, since it\u0027s used in more places than I assumed it was. A new function that is called under the hood by ast_app_group_set_channel would preserve existing API, and contain the default value to a single place. Do the inheritance matter for existing function calls, or only the ones that are made within func_groupcount?", + "revId": "7c21c70c50012e8ceec2c8b1cab379869199d3cb", + "serverId": "c8638cca-8a65-4d18-ba9a-ecd43d1ca9c1" } ] } \ No newline at end of file