Remove some redundant logic from wait_for_answer. This also let's us get rid of one of

those XXX comments from the code.

The redundancy occurs because the 'single' flag implies that the 'r' and 'm' flags are
not set, so there's no need to explicitly check them again.



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@107530 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
1.6.1
Mark Michelson 17 years ago
parent acb73c7448
commit 5176911dfe

@ -751,19 +751,21 @@ static struct ast_channel *wait_for_answer(struct ast_channel *in,
ast_debug(1, "Dunno what to do with control type %d\n", f->subclass);
}
} else if (single) {
/* XXX are we sure the logic is correct ? or we should just switch on f->frametype ? */
if (f->frametype == AST_FRAME_VOICE && !ast_test_flag64(outgoing, OPT_RINGBACK|OPT_MUSICBACK)) {
if (ast_write(in, f))
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to forward voice frame\n");
} else if (f->frametype == AST_FRAME_IMAGE && !ast_test_flag64(outgoing, OPT_RINGBACK|OPT_MUSICBACK)) {
if (ast_write(in, f))
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to forward image\n");
} else if (f->frametype == AST_FRAME_TEXT && !ast_test_flag64(outgoing, OPT_RINGBACK|OPT_MUSICBACK)) {
if (ast_write(in, f))
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to send text\n");
} else if (f->frametype == AST_FRAME_HTML && !ast_test_flag64(outgoing, DIAL_NOFORWARDHTML)) {
if (ast_channel_sendhtml(in, f->subclass, f->data, f->datalen) == -1)
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to send URL\n");
switch (f->frametype) {
case AST_FRAME_VOICE:
case AST_FRAME_IMAGE:
case AST_FRAME_TEXT:
if (ast_write(in, f)) {
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to write frame\n");
}
break;
case AST_FRAME_HTML:
if (!ast_test_flag64(outgoing, DIAL_NOFORWARDHTML) && ast_channel_sendhtml(in, f->subclass, f->data, f->datalen) == -1) {
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to send URL\n");
}
break;
default:
break;
}
}
ast_frfree(f);

Loading…
Cancel
Save