You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
asterisk/include
Steve Murphy fd1fc0a9c1
This update will fix the situation that occurs as described by 9717, where when several targets are specified for a dial, if any one them reports FAIL, the whole call gets FAIL, even though others were ringing OK. I rearranged the priorities, so that a new disposition, NULL, is at the lowest level, and the disposition get init'd to NULL. Then, next up is FAIL, and next up is BUSY, then NOANSWER, then ANSWERED. All the related set routines will only do so if the disposition value to be set to is greater than what's already there. This gives the intended effect. So, if all the targets are busy, you'd get BUSY for the call disposition. If all get BUSY, but one, and that one rings is not answered, you get NOANSWER. If by some freak of nature, the NULL value doesn't get overridden, then the disp2str routine will report NOANSWER as before.
18 years ago
..
asterisk This update will fix the situation that occurs as described by 9717, where when several targets are specified for a dial, if any one them reports FAIL, the whole call gets FAIL, even though others were ringing OK. I rearranged the priorities, so that a new disposition, NULL, is at the lowest level, and the disposition get init'd to NULL. Then, next up is FAIL, and next up is BUSY, then NOANSWER, then ANSWERED. All the related set routines will only do so if the disposition value to be set to is greater than what's already there. This gives the intended effect. So, if all the targets are busy, you'd get BUSY for the call disposition. If all get BUSY, but one, and that one rings is not answered, you get NOANSWER. If by some freak of nature, the NULL value doesn't get overridden, then the disp2str routine will report NOANSWER as before. 18 years ago
solaris-compat remove extraneous svn:executable properties 20 years ago
asterisk.h Don't check for error when lowering priority (according to the manpage, it should never happen anyway). It might could happen, though, if another thread messed with the priority, so safeguard against that (reported via -dev list). 18 years ago