asterisk

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Matthew Jordan	ca61a05506	Handle an originated channel being sent into a non-empty bridge Originated channels are a bit odd - they are technically a dialed channel (thus the party B or peer) but, since there is no caller, they are treated as the party A. When entering into a bridge that already contains participants, the CDR engine - if the CDR record is in the Dial state - attempts to match the person entering the bridge with an existing participant. The idea is that if you dialed someone and the person you dialed is already in the bridge, you don't need a new CDR record, the existing CDR record describes the relationship. Unfortunately, for an originated channel, there is no Party B. If no one was in the bridge this didn't cause any issues; however, if participants were in the bridge the CDR engine would attempt to match a non-existant Party B on the channel's CDR record and explode. This patch fixes that, and a unit test has been added to cover this case. git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@393164 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3	12 years ago
Matthew Jordan	6258bbe7bd	Update Asterisk's CDRs for the new bridging framework This patch is the initial push to update Asterisk's CDR engine for the new bridging framework. This patch guts the existing CDR engine and builds the new on top of messages coming across Stasis. As changes in channel state and bridge state are detected, CDRs are built and dispatched accordingly. This fundamentally changes CDRs in a few ways. (1) CDRs are now very reflective of the actual state of channels and bridges. This means CDRs track well with what an actual channel is doing - which is useful in transfer scenarios (which were previously difficult to pin down). It does, however, mean that CDRs cannot be 'fooled'. Previous behavior in Asterisk allowed for CDR applications, channels, and other properties to be spoofed in parts of the code - this no longer works. (2) CDRs have defined behavior in multi-party scenarios. This behavior will not be what everyone wants, but it is a defined behavior and as such, it is predictable. (3) The CDR manipulation functions and applications have been overhauled. Major changes have been made to ResetCDR and ForkCDR in particular. Many of the options for these two applications no longer made any sense with the new framework and the (slightly) more immutable nature of CDRs. There are a plethora of other changes. For a full description of CDR behavior, see the CDR specification on the Asterisk wiki. (closes issue ASTERISK-21196) Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2486/ git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@391947 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3	12 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Matthew Jordan

ca61a05506

Handle an originated channel being sent into a non-empty bridge

Originated channels are a bit odd - they are technically a dialed channel (thus
the party B or peer) but, since there is no caller, they are treated as the
party A. When entering into a bridge that already contains participants, the CDR
engine - if the CDR record is in the Dial state - attempts to match the person
entering the bridge with an existing participant. The idea is that if you dialed
someone and the person you dialed is already in the bridge, you don't need a new
CDR record, the existing CDR record describes the relationship.

Unfortunately, for an originated channel, there is no Party B. If no one was in
the bridge this didn't cause any issues; however, if participants were in the
bridge the CDR engine would attempt to match a non-existant Party B on the
channel's CDR record and explode.

This patch fixes that, and a unit test has been added to cover this case.



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@393164 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3

Matthew Jordan

6258bbe7bd

Update Asterisk's CDRs for the new bridging framework

This patch is the initial push to update Asterisk's CDR engine for the new
bridging framework. This patch guts the existing CDR engine and builds the new
on top of messages coming across Stasis. As changes in channel state and bridge
state are detected, CDRs are built and dispatched accordingly. This
fundamentally changes CDRs in a few ways.
(1) CDRs are now *very* reflective of the actual state of channels and bridges.
This means CDRs track well with what an actual channel is doing - which
is useful in transfer scenarios (which were previously difficult to pin
down). It does, however, mean that CDRs cannot be 'fooled'. Previous
behavior in Asterisk allowed for CDR applications, channels, and other
properties to be spoofed in parts of the code - this no longer works.
(2) CDRs have defined behavior in multi-party scenarios. This behavior will not
be what everyone wants, but it is a defined behavior and as such, it is
predictable.
(3) The CDR manipulation functions and applications have been overhauled. Major
changes have been made to ResetCDR and ForkCDR in particular. Many of the
options for these two applications no longer made any sense with the new
framework and the (slightly) more immutable nature of CDRs.

There are a plethora of other changes. For a full description of CDR behavior,
see the CDR specification on the Asterisk wiki.

(closes issue ASTERISK-21196)

Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2486/

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@391947 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3

2 Commits (f7624718f82ea3b6ad3e7a27ff931d0100d6f98d)