closes issue #11233 -- where some fine points in the algorithm to build the tree needed to be corrected. Many thanks for the test case, jtodd

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@89256 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
1.6.0
Steve Murphy 18 years ago
parent 3846390d00
commit f0a7e86177

@ -1107,13 +1107,16 @@ struct match_char *add_exten_to_pattern_tree(struct ast_context *con, struct ast
specif = 1;
}
if (already && (m2=already_in_tree(m1,buf))) {
if (already && (m2=already_in_tree(m1,buf)) && m2->next_char) {
if (!(*(s1+1))) /* if this is the end of the pattern, but not the end of the tree, then mark this node with the exten...
a shorter pattern might win if the longer one doesn't match */
m1->exten = e1;
m2->exten = e1;
m1 = m2->next_char; /* m1 points to the node to compare against */
} else {
m1 = add_pattern_node(con, m1, buf, pattern, already,specif); /* m1 is the node just added */
if (m2) {
m1 = m2;
} else
m1 = add_pattern_node(con, m1, buf, pattern, already,specif); /* m1 is the node just added */
if (!(*(s1+1)))
m1->exten = e1;
already = 0;

Loading…
Cancel
Save