Merged revisions 205776 via svnmerge from

https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk

................
  r205776 | mmichelson | 2009-07-10 10:56:45 -0500 (Fri, 10 Jul 2009) | 16 lines
  
  Merged revisions 205775 via svnmerge from 
  https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
  
  ........
    r205775 | mmichelson | 2009-07-10 10:51:36 -0500 (Fri, 10 Jul 2009) | 10 lines
    
    Ensure that outbound NOTIFY requests are properly routed through stateful proxies.
    
    With this change, we make note of Record-Route headers present in any SUBSCRIBE
    request that we receive so that our outbound NOTIFY requests will have the proper
    Route headers in them.
    
    (closes issue #14725)
    Reported by: ibc
  ........
................


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.6.1@205778 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3

channels/chan_sip.c

@@ -9667,8 +9667,11 @@ static void initreqprep(struct sip_request *req, struct sip_pvt *p, int sipmetho
 
 	add_header(req, "Via", p->via);
 	add_header(req, "Max-Forwards", DEFAULT_MAX_FORWARDS);
-	/* SLD: FIXME?: do Route: here too?  I think not cos this is the first request.
-	 * OTOH, then we won't have anything in p->route anyway */
+	/* This will be a no-op most of the time. However, under certain circumstances,
+	 * NOTIFY messages will use this function for preparing the request and should
+	 * have Route headers present.
+	 */
+	add_route(req, p->route);
 
 	/* Build Remote Party-ID and From */
 	if (ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_SENDRPID) && (sipmethod == SIP_INVITE)) {
@@ -19695,6 +19698,7 @@ static int handle_request_subscribe(struct sip_pvt *p, struct sip_request *req,
 		if (sipdebug)
 			ast_debug(4, "Initializing initreq for method %s - callid %s\n", sip_methods[req->method].text, p->callid);
 		check_via(p, req);
+		build_route(p, req, 0);
 	} else if (req->debug && req->ignore)
 		ast_verbose("Ignoring this SUBSCRIBE request\n");