Merged revisions 192932 via svnmerge from

https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

........
  r192932 | tilghman | 2009-05-07 11:29:08 -0500 (Thu, 07 May 2009) | 10 lines
  
  Eliminate repetition of fullcontact during reconstruction.
  If the fullcontact field appears in both the sippeers and the
  sipregs table, then during reconstruction of the field, it will
  otherwise be doubled.
  (closes issue #14754)
   Reported by: Alexei Gradinari
   Patches: 
         20090506__bug14754.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14)
   Tested by: lmadsen
........


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@192933 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3

channels/chan_sip.c

@@ -23220,6 +23220,7 @@ static struct sip_peer *build_peer(const char *name, struct ast_variable *v, str
 	struct sip_peer tmp_peer;
 	const char *srvlookup = NULL;
 	static int deprecation_warning = 1;
+	int alt_fullcontact = alt ? 1 : 0;
 	struct ast_str *fullcontact = ast_str_alloca(512);
 
 	if (!realtime || ast_test_flag(&global_flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_RTCACHEFRIENDS)) {
@@ -23310,6 +23311,15 @@ static struct sip_peer *build_peer(const char *name, struct ast_variable *v, str
 		} else if (realtime && !strcasecmp(v->name, "name"))
 			ast_copy_string(peer->name, v->value, sizeof(peer->name));
 		else if (realtime && !strcasecmp(v->name, "fullcontact")) {
+			if (alt_fullcontact && !alt) {
+				/* Reset, because the alternate also has a fullcontact and we
+				 * do NOT want the field value to be doubled. It might be
+				 * tempting to skip this, but the first table might not have
+				 * fullcontact and since we're here, we know that the alternate
+				 * absolutely does. */
+				alt_fullcontact = 0;
+				ast_str_reset(fullcontact);
+			}
 			/* Reconstruct field, because realtime separates our value at the ';' */
 			if (fullcontact->used > 0) {
 				ast_str_append(&fullcontact, 0, ";%s", v->value);